On May 11, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> Kevan,
> Ugh.  Thanks for looking at this.  I guess it goes to show you can't just 
> trust that another project that says it is MIT licensed is *completely* MIT 
> licensed.  :(  I'll figure out a way to deal with it.  If it works out that 
> bcpowmod.php and str_split.php are not actually needed, can I just remove 
> them?  If so, do I need to document that modification somewhere?

Removal would seem to be a great way to fix. I can't see any problems with 

I don't see a need for any documentation (beyond an svn commit message), unless 
it affects the behavior of VCL (something users need to understand) or has 
potential ramifications for future development work…


Reply via email to