On May 11, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> Kevan,
> Ugh.  Thanks for looking at this.  I guess it goes to show you can't just 
> trust that another project that says it is MIT licensed is *completely* MIT 
> licensed.  :(  I'll figure out a way to deal with it.  If it works out that 
> bcpowmod.php and str_split.php are not actually needed, can I just remove 
> them?  If so, do I need to document that modification somewhere?

BTW, vcl/trunk/web/.ht-inc/phpseclib/index.html refers to PHP Secure 
Communications Library as LGPL-licensed. Which is contradicted by 

It looks like our documentation comes from 
http://phpseclib.sourceforge.net/documentation/ -- I'd check with the phpseclib 
project. Seems to be their reference to LGPL is unintended or inconsistent. 
bcpowmod.php's LGPL license would seem to be a problem with this, however…  


Reply via email to