On 24/06/07, Riny Qian <Riny.Qian at sun.com> wrote: > Shawn Walker wrote: > > Instead of a flat out password required on switch, by password > > required on switch after X seconds of inactivity could be done? > > Yes, I think it could be done, but not secure. Would the extra > complexity bring us much value? Users may need to remember how > many seconds left for an inactive session? For simplicity, users > can just directly disable the secure switch.
Well, that just turns of all security then. I'd rather feel somewhat safe knowing that if I walk away from a terminal for so long that it will be secure automatically after a specified time period. -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst binarycrusader at gmail.com - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
