also sprach Frédéric Brière <fbri...@fbriere.net> [2009.05.05.2154 +0200]:
> Let's say I've once created the topic branch fixes/foo, which has now
> been incorporated in the latest upstream release.  What is the best way
> of dealing with this now-obsolete branch?  (Let's pretend for
> simplicity's sake that it is not part of any other branch's base.)

See #505303. This is also not yet implemented, but pasky worked out
the logic in the referenced URL
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/95858

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madd...@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
anyone who says sunshine brings happiness
has never danced in the rain.

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

_______________________________________________
vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list
vcs-pkg-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss

Reply via email to