On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 10:55:23AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Frédéric Brière <fbri...@fbriere.net> [2009.05.07.0232 +0200]: > > Yeah, but it'll remain in your refs/heads namespace forever, won't it? > > Kinda sucks to have git-branch spew out every patch that's ever existed. > > :( > Like git-tag "spews" out every tag ever created?
The level of annoyance is quite different. When I, as a newcomer of a given repo, do "git tag" I know I'm looking at a lot of "not current" information. On the contrary, when I do "git branch" I start trying figure out what each branch means. Having around a lot of no longer used branches is very annoying in that respect. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list vcs-pkg-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss