On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 03:56:54PM -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28 2010, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > My original motivation for TopGit development was that I actually was > > the _only_ developer, but I needed to maintain and develop in multiple > > clones in a sensible way. > > > > Maybe you are happy doing things your way, but I'm trying to explain why > > many people aren't. > > I have no objection to people preferring different workflows than > the one I use, as long as they do not tell me that mine is irrelevant, > obsolete, or otherwise incorrect. (and I am missing the email that I > have commented on in the thread where you, and not Enrico, is > explaining their workflow, so I might be somewhat off base here).
I'm sorry for the confusion, the second paragraph in my mail was not meant at you but Enrico. > To come to your email, are you stating that TopGit is designed > for people working alone, or in small teams, and not publishing their > branches for other people to work on? If that is the case, it is > certainly a valid use case, but certainly not universal; and might not > be suited for a chain of repositories where several distribution > package maintainers derive from the work on their immediate upstream > distribution. No, I'm not saying that, I only stated my motivation. TopGit was designed to provide universal support for distributed workflows. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis http://pasky.or.cz/ | "Ars longa, vita brevis." -- Hippocrates _______________________________________________ vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss