Hi, Klaus Schmidinger schrieb:
>>> How does the attached PES file look like? In vdr-xine, I send it just >>> once and it looks OK in xine. >>> >>> When it looks ok, I'll have to search for the commands which created it ;-) >>> >>> I think, I had specified an option to create progressive frames. >> >> After running your file through >> >> mplex -f 7 -o test.mpg noSignal.mpg You're right. That's why it nolonger has the extension .pes ;-) >> and displaying test.mpg trough cPlayer::PlayPes() I get a pefectly >> smooth display. >> >> Would be great if you could find the commands that created this one. See attachment. This is what file says about my input file: noSignal.png: PNG image data, 720 x 576, 8-bit/color RGB, non-interlaced > One more thing: the 'file' command reports > > MPEG sequence, v2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] interlaced Y'CbCr 4:2:0 video, 4CIF > PAL, 4:3, 25 fps > > on a file created with the posted script (before the mplex call), > while for your noSignal.mpg it reports > > MPEG sequence, v2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] interlaced Y'CbCr 4:2:0 video, > CCIR/ITU PAL 625, 4:3, 25 fps > > Maybe this indicates where the problem might be? Don't think so. Bye. -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mkNoSignal.sh
Description: application/shellscript
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
