Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> For me personally playbackability with VDR was never a priority.
> I've been using VDR for recording since Oktober 2000, back then i had to
> write my own cutting scripts, since VDR didn't had the cutting function
> until later. A few month later i began writing my Master-Timer. VDR has
> been the "recording slave" ever since. ;-)
> Since 2003 i use vdrsync/tcmplex for the actual cutting (As it
> demultiplexes and remultiplexes the recording, i.e. it verifies that the
> recording is good(tm)) to single .mpg-files which i than watch &
> Mostly i playback at my computer, especially since i bought a 1920x1200
> 24" TFT a few month back, but for TV playback i also have a "Pinnacle
> Showcenter 200". I only use VDR playback to cut music-videos (or to find
> the beginning of a song i want to cut out, to be more precise), that's
> the only playback related feature where VDR excels anything else i have
> Over the years i've recorded more than 13.000 broadcasts, stored on 55
> HDDs with a total capacity of 20 TB. ;-)
For me playbackability with VDR is really needed. I like dvbcut more
than vdrsync because with the linear/logarithmic sliders you can really
easy find start and end of ads or similar.
20TB. That would be more than 5000 single layer DVDs. What a mess. HDs
are much easier to handle. But i really dont want to have 13000
recordings! Have fun.
vdr mailing list