"VDR User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I will however give you an example.  There was a time when the
> majority of dvb users I talk to used VDR, and only a few guys used
> MythTV.  Now the opposite is true.  The majority of those people are
> using MythTV and few are left who still use VDR.  Why?  Primarily lack
> of support for what's already been previously discussed a million
> times.. Lack of support for HDTV, MPEG4, DVB-S2, and a recording
> format that is actually usable.  The only surprise to me is how many
> people burn their recordings to DVD.  I don't have any interest in
> doing that but clearly a whole lot of other people do.

i'm not into dvb-s2 yet.
Without talking about this hype technology, what about :
- multiple frontend+osd support
- complex channel handling (no no not talking about xml, i hate xml)
- sourcecap patch (having to patch vdr for such a feature is a no-go
  for a lot of people)

I tend to agree, in the end a lot of people will move to
bloat^Wmythtv. (and i agree, a lot of people have stopped using vdr)


vdr mailing list

Reply via email to