Thanks a lot, Clemens, for your reply. This is my mistake that I didn't explain clearly what actually I need. I use LinuxMCE (http://linuxmce.com) with integrated VDR 1.6.0. I have just VDR headers and binary. So, I can easily build any plugins which have debian patch using dpkg-buildpackage. In that case the plugins work fine. But for those which don't have that there is an only one way to build them using common way - make plugins from the VDR source directory. So, I think I can make a symlink to patched headers in the $VDR_SORUCE/include/vdr and theoretically it should work.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Clemens Kirchgatterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > "Michael Stepanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > what does "VDR distribution" mean? the vdr source code? what are you > > > trying to achieve? i guess you have to download the "desired" vdr > > > version, copy your plugins into its PLUGINS/src directory and > > > compile them as usual. > > > Yes, I mean VDR sources. I understand how to build plugins using > > headers from the VDR's sources. But in my case I have patched headers > > only (source is not available yet - headers only). > > i don't see the point. if the header files are different in respect to > ABI compatibillity (for example class member order, number of members > or object size) then your plugins will not work anyway. if the headers > are compatible, it does not matter which one you used to compile them. > > anyway, vdr and plugins must be compiled with "compatible" header > files. this is what the APIVERSION is for. you could try to copy your > patched headers over a fresh vdr source tree and compile it including > your plugins. > > hope this helps ... > clemens > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr > -- Cheers, Michael
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
