If the netclient hardware runs GPL software I assume that in theory someone
could implement a streamdev client that facilitated the hw mepg2/4 decoder?

2009/4/14 Georg Acher <ac...@in.tum.de>

> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 04:03:02PM +0200, Matthias Müller wrote:
> > I have no netceiver to play with and didn't look at the sources. But
> > it's nice to see a real world use for IPv6 in consumer hardware (if you
> > can call the reel boxes consumer hardware, it's probably only for a
> > limited, but sophisticated market.
> The client and the also available standalone NetCeiver should bring it more
> to the "masses" as the price will be comparable to typical HDTV receivers.
> > Does it just use a fixed multicast-address to receive the stream and if
> > yes, how is the communication to the tuner realized? Is this something
> > reel-specific or could this be used to start a unified streaming-concept
> > for vdr based on standards (and using IPv6 to avoid all that ugly IPv4
> > stuff...)
> It is a proprietory protocol in the sense as it is no standard. When there
> are so many IPTV standards to choose from, why make not a new one? ;-) At
> the time we started, DVB-IPTV was not even named and still I think it is so
> bloated that it cannot be efficiently used to use cheap hardware as a
> server.
> However, our protocol uses standard protocols like MLDv2 just with a
> different interpretation to make it light-weight and use hardware supported
> streaming. In the end, one NetCeiver can stream up to 6 full
> S2-transponders
> (~40MByte/s), only the zapping time increases a bit... Do that with a PC :p
> The protocol translates (almost) all DVB specifics to ethernet, so it was
> no
> problem to wrap it back to DVB-API. The multicast address is not static but
> contains all relevant reception parameters. The basic communication only
> exchanges a few MLDv2-messages (no XML), so it can be processed very fast
> and also gains from MLDv2-aware switches. Only tuner capabilities and
> tuning
> states (SNR, lock, ...) are transmitted regularly in a side band via XML on
> a specific multicast address. That also allows zero configuration for the
> client. We will write a "white paper" about the protocol, currently we just
> don't have enough time...
> For the client side, the sources will be published as GPL. Currently we use
> a closed source daemon with a dvb loopback driver in the kernel, but that
> makes it hard to fully use the tuner virtualization and costs some overhead
> for small CPUs. Since we already have a native vdr plugin for that, the
> network code will be then forced to be GPL anyway ;-)
> --
>         Georg Acher, ac...@in.tum.de
>         http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~acher
>         "Oh no, not again !" The bowl of petunias
> _______________________________________________
> vdr mailing list
> vdr@linuxtv.org
> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

vdr mailing list

Reply via email to