Op Zo, 31 mei, 2009 11:47, schreef Magnus Hörlin:
> Seppo Ingalsuo wrote:
> I have to agree that the vdpau deinterlacers are better than the tvtime
> ones, including the temporal only deinterlacer that is used for 1080i.
> But it is as you say a little annoying that paused images are not
> deinterlaced. I use the ION platform with 9400M.
> /Magnus H

Yes, the deinterlacer works much nicer in combination with VDPAU. But with
VDPAU I have two issues and this is why I haven't upgraded to VDPAU
completely as off yet:

1. The maximum usage through VDPAU is in my case an additional 50W
(compared to the ExtensionHD with a maximum of 10W) because I've got a
PCI-e based videocard;
2. Using plugins like vdr-xine and/or xineliboutput you have buffering
time which is annoying for zap speeds on encrypted channels.

Currently I use the Reel-VDR fork and it seems to work quite nicely. And
it doesn't require many patches to get it working, only some S2API based


Niels Wagenaar

vdr mailing list

Reply via email to