Am Montag, den 13.12.2010, 23:03 +0100 schrieb Joerg Bornkessel:
> > Am Montag, den 13.12.2010, 00:29 +0100 schrieb Joerg Bornkessel:
> 
> >> > Am Samstag, den 25.09.2010, 13:15 +0200 schrieb Joerg Bornkessel:
> 
> > I was wondering why skincurses had no patch applied or change regarding
> > `LDFLAGS` [3] and for example vdr-burn [4] has a separate patch. Then I
> > found `vdr-plugin.eclass` [5] where the replacement is done using `sed`.
> 
> some plugins (just a handfull) create beside on the plugin lib a helper lib 
> or bin.
> to fix the makefile in this part will not fixed by the vdr-plugin.eclass.
> See this depended bug for vdr-burn
> 
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339328
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=249154

Thanks, actually I read that ticket before sending my message. It is
great that you confirmed my guess. Could you reply to my »PATCH v2« if
you have time please so that Klaus knows it is ready to be committed.

> > I am using the OpenEmbedded framework [6].
> 
> hmm, sounds interresting,
> On what Hardware will this run, then?

I am planning on using the BeagleBoard [8] which is ARM Cortex A8 based.

T. Brinkmann is working on getting VDR to run on the BeagleBoard too
[9], but there are some problems to use it as the output device.


Thanks,

Paul


[7] http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/Ångström
[8] http://beagleboard.org/
[9] http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard/msg/1b3fabd83fa9190e

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Reply via email to