On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:18:03 +0200
Udo Richter <udo_rich...@gmx.de> wrote:

> Am 19.08.2011 15:30, schrieb Steffen Barszus:
> >>>> On 08/19/11 11:46, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> >>>>> i would like to request, that
> >>>>> vdr is storing the length of a recording and make it accessible
> >>>>> to the plug-ins.
> >
> > Where it gets stored is not my point, that it can be served from in
> > meory data read by ScanVideoDir is my point. 
> > 
> > - read&compute by the core
> > - dont access harddisk for known recordings
> > - dont do it multiple times, if more then one part of vdr wants to
> > know it. 
> > 
> > If its only in memory and read by the scanner its fine with me. 
> > 
> > for medium to large recording base we speak about minutes not
> > milliseconds for reading that data. 
> Maybe some kind of caching mechanism, but please don't calculate the
> length every time while doing the scan of the video directory. The
> directory scanner is already slow enough, no need to add these minutes
> to it.

It's slow since it needs to iterate through all recordings 
and check file size of the index file (thats what i understand from
Klaus comment), so divide that by number of frames of the recording and
thats it. the directory scanner is anyway doing the same (iterating
the video directory and pick up necessary information). So it wouldn't
add anything substantially. 

vdr mailing list

Reply via email to