----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <[email protected]> > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Simon Grinberg" <[email protected]>, "VDSM Project Development" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:20:11 PM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] MTU setting according to ifcfg files. > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:49:10PM -0500, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > > Itamar though a bomb that we should co-exist on generic host, this > > is > > something I do not know to compute. I still waiting for a response > > of > > where this requirement came from and if that mandatory. > > > > This bomb has been ticking since ever. We have ovirt-node images for > pure hypervisor nodes, but we support plain Linux nodes, where local > admins are free to `yum upgrade` in the least convenient moment. The > latter mode can be the stuff that nightmares are made of, but it also > allows the flexibility and bleeding-endgeness we all cherish. >
There is a different between having generic OS and having generic setup, running your email server, file server and LDAP on a node that running VMs. I have no problem in having generic OS (opposed of ovirt-node) but have full control over that. Alon. _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
