----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com>
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alo...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Simon Grinberg" <si...@redhat.com>, "VDSM Project Development"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:20:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] MTU setting according to ifcfg files.
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:49:10PM -0500, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Itamar though a bomb that we should co-exist on generic host, this
> > is
> > something I do not know to compute. I still waiting for a response
> > of
> > where this requirement came from and if that mandatory.
> This bomb has been ticking since ever. We have ovirt-node images for
> pure hypervisor nodes, but we support plain Linux nodes, where local
> admins are free to `yum upgrade` in the least convenient moment. The
> latter mode can be the stuff that nightmares are made of, but it also
> allows the flexibility and bleeding-endgeness we all cherish.
There is a different between having generic OS and having generic setup,
running your email server, file server and LDAP on a node that running VMs.
I have no problem in having generic OS (opposed of ovirt-node) but have full
control over that.
vdsm-devel mailing list