On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:53:41PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> > 1) Can you provide more info on why there is a exception for 'lvm
> > based
> > block domain'. Its not coming out clearly.
> File based domains are responsible for syncing up object manipulation
> The backend is responsible for making sure it all works either by having a
> single writer (NFS) or having it's own locking mechanism (gluster).
> In our LVM based domains VDSM is responsible for basic object manipulation.
> The current design uses an approach where there is a single host responsible
> for object creation\deleteion it is the SRM\SDM\SPM\S?M.
> If we ever find a way to make it fully clustered without a big hit in
> performance the S?M requirement will be removed form that type of domain.
I would like to see us maintain a LOCALFS domain as well. For this, we would
also need SRM, correct?
Adam Litke <a...@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
vdsm-devel mailing list