on 1/31/01 1:20 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ditto. We'd appreciate help making Turbine a better "out of the box" > experience, however. At CollabNet, we use only selected pieces of > Tubine, and have no problem configuring it as such (meaning you don't > have to use *all* its functionality). In fact, that is a goal of Turbine. I don't mind seeing someone using Turbine within *their* own framework and in fact, I encourage it. However, putting a framework into the Velocity project is well beyond the goals of the Velocity project and therefore, I would be -1 on that. -jon
- [PATCH] ResourceManager.java and VelocityServlet.java Christoph Reck
- RE: [PATCH] ResourceManager.java and VelocityServl... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] ResourceManager.java and VelocityS... Christoph Reck
- Re: [PATCH] ResourceManager.java and VelocityServl... Jon Stevens
- Re: [PATCH] ResourceManager.java and VelocityServl... Jon Stevens
- [OT/Long] Re: [PATCH] ResourceManager.java and Vel... Jon Stevens
- [OT/Long] Re: [PATCH] ResourceManager.java and... Christoph Reck
- Re: [PATCH] ResourceManager.java and VelocityS... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] ResourceManager.java and VelocityServl... Daniel Rall
- Re: [PATCH] ResourceManager.java and VelocityServl... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] ResourceManager.java and VelocityS... Christoph Reck
