Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 1/31/01 1:20 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ditto. We'd appreciate help making Turbine a better "out of the box"
> > experience, however. At CollabNet, we use only selected pieces of
> > Tubine, and have no problem configuring it as such (meaning you don't
> > have to use *all* its functionality).
>
> In fact, that is a goal of Turbine. I don't mind seeing someone using
> Turbine within *their* own framework and in fact, I encourage it.
>
> However, putting a framework into the Velocity project is well beyond the
> goals of the Velocity project and therefore, I would be -1 on that.
And furthermore, there won't be a C compiler, transaction monitoring, or
a pony.
:D
Can we please stop this thread now? It's pretty clear that we are all
in agreement that we aren't doing any framework stuff in Velocity.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Velocity : it's not just a good idea. It should be the law.
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
