Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0

[Jason van Zyl]

Daniel Rall wrote:

> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If they work the same, is it really that much of a leap?
>
> No, it's not a leap at all.  But zero learning curve is always the
> best kind.  ;)

I'd say it's pretty much zero. I'm totally for ease of use, and we
can still use Properties if it's really seen as necessary. I just don't
want to put a parsing hack in the Runtime when the Configuration
class does it all.

>
>
> I don't feel strongly about it either way, just like the simplicity of
> using a standard Java library class.  Consistancy has as much--if not
> more--value, however.
> --

I think using the configuration class makes things more consistent,
and we can name the class SmartProperties/ExtendedProperties
to keep things at a familiar level.

>

>
> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine