another reason to get rid of Properties: If we move to an XML based configuration, we will need a way to do that anyway and you can't map a Properties object to all of the different forms of XML configuration that are possible. We could make the Configuration object an interface and then have PropertiesConfiguration and XMLConfiguration implementations. -jon
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Jason van Zyl
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Daniel Rall
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Jason van Zyl
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Daniel Rall
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Jason van Zyl
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Jon Stevens
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Jason van Zyl
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Jon Stevens
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 jeff
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Daniel Rall
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Christoph Reck
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- RE: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
