jeff wrote: > > How about whoever wants to use Properties: make an adapter that converts a > Properties to a Configuration, add it to the contrib directory and then be > done with this discussion. It's not that simple. The problems come in because the new multi-path properties were defined (this weekend) such that you *can't* use a Properties. Other than that, we have supported Properties for initialization since late November. All I am arguing is that we can slightly alter the muli-path properties to work with a Properties object. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Daniel Rall
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Jason van Zyl
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Jon Stevens
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Jason van Zyl
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Jon Stevens
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 jeff
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Daniel Rall
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Christoph Reck
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- RE: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Jason van Zyl
- Re: [Proposal] Velocity Release Plan 1.0 Geir Magnusson Jr.
