Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
>
> I guess we have been looking at different issues on these matter.
No - remember, my concern at first was preformance, performance,
performance... :)
> I was looking at how to make the framework as simple and efficient as
> possible from the execution point of view. That is why I am concern on how
> the EventCartridge and the nodes deal with event notification (I mistakenly
> refered to the Context instead of the nodes). And why things like typeing
> seem like important to me.
Take a look - they are checked in now. Sorry bout the delay.
I am trying to keep all type checking and manipulation nonsensense
contained in the EventCartridge, to happen at addHandler() time, not at
merge() time.
So I do have casts, but they are cheap, right? And I can even get
around those.
The EventCartridge has a method for each of the event handler types, to
the nodes don't have to mess around sorting and checking.
>
> On your side, I think you were more concern on having a stable general API
> for the users to use.
No. :)
To refer to a previous post of mine :
"We are in a speed race with our WebMacro bretheren, and we are *not*
going to lose! And to be a credible alternative to JSP in high volume
environments, speed speed speed."
> I guess our concerns complement each other. I will take a look at what you
> are proposing before making more comments.
Cool. Be gentle :) This all isn't fully formed yet.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
