Daniel Dekany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Friday, June 13, 2003, 10:04:46 PM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
>> Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>last year or so. We are now in our 4th major release cycle of the last
>>>16 months, and each such cycle has added major new features. Come to
>>>think of it, I wonder: what was the last significant feature added to
>>>Velocity and when was it added?
>>
>> Can you tell me, what the "significant features" were, that you've added.
>Well, he has contribute to FreeMarker instead (and later become to the
>lead developer). Also me. You know, I rather choose the project were
>efforts results in improvements. I don't think there is anything bad
>with it. Everybody chooses what OS project that he wants to support with
>hies efforts, and then independently of this, as a matter of fact,
>Velocity is frozen. It's does not make sense to hit back with the
>question above.
Hi,
sorry if this came across wrong. I just wanted to know in which areas
FreeMaker has improved over the last major releases.
As it stands, I do consider the number of Velocity functions to be
good enough to get the value done. I just wanted to know where in your
or Jonathans' opinion FreeMaker is superior to Velocity so I can
understand where Velocity can improve.
My mail wasn't meant to put FreeMarker down. I apologize for that.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
