martin
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Maybe this part of the thread go to the Turbine list? There may be more interest there :)
geir
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 09:14 AM, Mike Williams wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:38:20 +0200, "Jonathan" == Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonathan> my perception is that FM support was removed from Turbine for
Jonathan> entirely murky, non-technical reasons.
Hmm. My reading of the discussion (as an innocent bystander) has been that
FM support was removed from Turbine because it was unmaintained, and that
it was unmaintained because nobody was using it (at least, nobody
interested enough to maintain it).
Jonathan> is it really very likely that I am going to invest any of my
Jonathan> own energy into helping you put the FM support back in there?
It appears not.
Jonathan> Obviously, my position is: "You guys removed it, you guys put
Jonathan> it back."
Jonathan, you appear to be *demanding* that the Turbine developers
reinstate FM support, but you're unwilling to help! I don't think you're
going to get very far with that kind of attitude. Can you understand why?
People generally invest time and effort to open-source tools because they
actively use them; why would anyone invest time in supporting a framework
that they didn't use?!
-- cheers, Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
