Bill Chmura wrote:
What event would be necessary in your view for a "need for future development to manifest itself"?


I do not honestly have the time to spend on this thread,

You're a funny guy, Bill. You've already got me laughing. :-)


but to answer
your question I would have to develop a need personally with What I am using it for. Then I would have a need for further
development.

Surely, you're not just talking about you, right? You mean people out there in general, right?


Well, if you follow this list, you will know that various patches have been submitted for things that (at least presumably) the people had a personal need for. And the patches were ignored. (Probably more patches would have been submitted but for the fact that it became pretty obvious that patches were just being ignored.)

So, it seems that your criterion has been satisfied and there is a need for further development.

Best Regards,

Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
FreeMarker-Velocity comparison page, http://freemarker.org/fmVsVel.html
FreeMarker 2.3pre4 is out!



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to