Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
"Llewellyn Falco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


:-) this bug has been in the tracker for months.


Can you give me a Bugzilla ID?


you will gain 2 new programmers to help breathe some life back into this project.


Velocity never was/is dead.

Henning,


I am reluctant to use the inflammatory L-word, but when you claim that the project never was/is dead, I cannot interpret this generously. AFAICT, you are knowingly stating a falsehood.

Given my role in the FreeMarker project, I keep an eye on this list off and on, to see what our main competitor in this space is up to. And, the answer is quite clearly is that it is going nowhere and that has been the case for at least 3 years. Tell me, what was the last significant feature added to Velocity and when was it added?

To me, it's really odd that you'd claim otherwise. Surely everybody subscribed to this list is familiar with that state of affairs. And, you know, the guy you're responding to has looked for himself at your bug tracker and anybody can see the neglected, pitiful state that this project is in. I mean, it's literally like you're attempting a bluff in a poker game when the guy has already seen your cards and knows you have nothing.


The current committers are just picky on
what should go in the tree, mainly because the strongest asset of
Velocity is stability.

<sigh>

Well, c'mon, that the thing's greatest asset is stability is a tacit admission that nothing is happening. That's the great asset you can always point to when nobody does anything: stability.

Rather overrated really. After all, if anybody wants stability, all they have to do is never upgrade when a new version comes out.

Anyway, you're fibbing again. The statement "The current committers are picky..." can only mean they actually review the patches and contributions and so on and reject all but the best. That is clearly not the case. Basically, bug reports and contributed patches are simply being ignored. That is because nobody (except Will, I guess) is really actively involved, i.e. the project is not being actively developed and maintained -- i.e. it's basically dead.

Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project http://freemarker.org
Velocity-FreeMarker comparison page: http://freemarker.org/fmVsVel.html





        Regards
                Henning



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to