first) compile-time dependency != runtime dependency second) static logging cannot be made backwards compatible with the current setup
seriously, if you want to pilot work on 2.0 go for it, but this really isn't worth discussing for 1.5. On 9/29/05, Llewellyn Falco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok, so i understand that this has been discussed fairly extensively in the > past, so i won't go into much, but... > > first) I fell that if we move to the 1.4, we might as well use the > java.logging as default as it reduces the depencies needed. > > second) The advantage of a static logging class is simply loggers don't need > to be passed arround, held on to, or unnessicallary created (say i remove > the logging of the even, but don't remove the logger). > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
