I'm starting to agree with you, Llwellyn. Though I don't think we should change the behavior of the templates for existing users.
WILL On 3/21/06, Llewellyn Falco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Personally, i feel that templates whose macro calls don't match up to > > the macro definitions are *already* broken. > > this is my general thought on the whole thing too. > > and as we deal in financial transactions, I take a general view of > it is better not to show something than to show something wrong. > > however, I can understand that in an entertainment situation you might > have > the exact opposite view. > again though, I think this goes back to a 2 modes of running. > > development - always halt on errors - someone's there to fix them. > deployment - do the best you can - log what goes wrong > > and see a setting much more in this idea. > > > > btw: this is also why I always develop with the UberspectTestImpl and > rather > think that it should be default Uberspect, while currently it is only in > the > test classes. > > Llewellyn. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com
