|
This area of discussion is not
scientific mind you, because there has not been data collection on it yet, as
far as I know. But I would be happy to share the measurements with you
that I use in my institution.
A 6F PICC is 2mm in size, and likely
a 3F is 1mm in size. (Our team has the I-Look by Sono-Site, which has
the capability to provide these measurements. The Site Rite 5 has recently
been updated to include a visual interpretation of the vessel size) I ball
part the 4F at 1.3mm and the 5F at 1.7mm. These are the base line
measurements that we go from. I then look at the hypercoagulability
of the patient, based on Virchow's Triad of Stasis and have deducted the
following. If a patient has no risk factors according to the triad,
then my goal is to decrease the blood flow in the vein by no more
than 50%, therefore a 6R (2mm) catheter would need a vessel size of at least
4mm. The vessel is scanned to assess for narrowing on up the vein and
if it is 4mm to the axillary, then I would place it. As far as
a 5F (1.7MM) the vessel would need to be at least 3.5mm in size. When a
tapered catheter is introduced, then as you can see, the size of the taper can
be as much as 8-9F, or up to 3mm. Is the vessel at least 3mm at the point
of introduction of the catheter? Maybe not, that is why I think that we
are seeing some thrombus, beginning at the insertion site of the
PICC.
If a patient is hypercoagulable,
then the criteria changes. For a 6F, I want to decrease the
blood flow only by 1/3 or 33%, therefore a vessel would need to be
6mm. Realistically, not a lot of patients have a vessel that is 6mm in size
unless you go high in the arm, where the basilic and the brachials often
join.
As far as what meets the criteria for
hypercoagulabiliy, I look at three things--the vein condition, blood flow
thru the veins and the underlying medical condition that can naturally
predispose the patient to thrombus formation.
Sorry to be so long winded, but I
think that this is necessary information for clinicians to understand when
placing large lumened catheters. I have a great interest in this
subject. If you want to talk further, please email me off the list so as
not to clog it up!
Before you say, show me the
data.....I will remind you that I am basing this on what I think and what I have
seen, not published data.
Cheryl Kelley RN
PICC Nurse and Infusion Consultant and PICC Nurse at West Virginia University Hospitals 304-823-3196 or 304-669-3061 |
- Re: reverse tapering Cheryl Kelley
- RE: reverse tapering Nancy Moureau
- Re: reverse tapering Michelle Hansen
- RE: DVT with picc line Ward Gina
- Re: reverse tapering Cheryl Kelley
- Re: reverse tapering Nadine Nakazawa
- Re: reverse tapering RainaFrog
- Re: reverse tapering Cheryl Kelley
- Re: reverse tapering Lynn Hadaway
- RE: reverse tapering Earhart, Ann
- Re: reverse tapering Cheryl Kelley
- Re: reverse tapering Lynn Hadaway
- Re: reverse tapering Cheryl Kelley
- Re: reverse tapering Roger Soriano
- Re: reverse tapering Roger Soriano
- reverse tapering Laura Cook RN
- RE: reverse tapering Kokotis, Kathy
- RE: reverse tapering Kokotis, Kathy
- RE: reverse tapering Kokotis, Kathy
- RE: reverse tapering Kokotis, Kathy
- RE: reverse tapering Margy Galloway
