That's really a shame to hear that git isn't being considered for Versions. I think it's stretching it a bit to say that there are "significant differences" between Subversion and git. The operations are the same. Versions even has a command to create a "local" repository, which has always confused me because SVN repos are meant to centralized, accessible remotely. Does Versions actually launch a server for this to work?
I just think that the Versions team had one goal in mind and wanted to achieve that goal really well. I salute them for that, and Versions has turned out to be a fantastic front-end for SVN. But I do want git support someday, and as a software developer, I know proper planning and abstraction can make it entirely possible. I won't hold my breath waiting for that day, though. :-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
