Hey Coolfactor, We hear you and never say never. But you conveniently leave out the license argument, which in my opinion is the biggest hurdle... They will probably have great reasons to go GPL, but it's really not that interesting to develop a commercial app around :-(
Kindest regards, Koen Bok - madebysofa.com On Dec 6, 1:19 am, coolfactor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's really a shame to hear that git isn't being considered for > Versions. I think it's stretching it a bit to say that there are > "significant differences" between Subversion and git. The operations > are the same. Versions even has a command to create a "local" > repository, which has always confused me because SVN repos are meant > to centralized, accessible remotely. Does Versions actually launch a > server for this to work? > > I just think that the Versions team had one goal in mind and wanted to > achieve that goal really well. I salute them for that, and Versions > has turned out to be a fantastic front-end for SVN. But I do want git > support someday, and as a software developer, I know proper planning > and abstraction can make it entirely possible. I won't hold my breath > waiting for that day, though. :-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
