As a daily user of both Subverison/Versions and Git/GitX, that has not been my experience at all. I find that my interactions with GitX are very much the same as with Versions. The main difference is that Versions is much more polished.
That said, I would much rather see you release a Git client as a separate app, rather than integrating Git into Versions. --mkb On Nov 20, 4:03 pm, Dirk Stoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adding git support to Versions would be like adding html and css > editing to iWork's Pages, it would feel like a kludge; the > application's interaction model doesn't fit with the model of that > particular task at all. Versions' aim is to keep as much of the > complexity of SVN out of your way as possible, but the way it works is > nonetheless modeled with that complexity in mind. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
