On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:01 PM, gemmazoejones wrote:
> > Guys, you're being a bit harsh. Educational pricing would be great, > but it takes time to consult the people who hold the purse strings in > a company. You or I can make snap decisions about our own products as > we run the show, but when you have investors who need to sign and run > everything through their legal departments these things can taken an > age. Stop acting like children demanding candy and show some respect > to the hard working people on the Versions team. > > Gemma Well said Gemma! To those who are kvetching: There is nothing to say that Versions should even have to provide educational licenses; frankly, your behavior is childish, and rude. If your education is not worth €39 then perhaps you need to re-evaluate you priorities, and if it's not for your education then shame on you for bitching in the first place! Versions is offered at a very reasonable price as-is, and unless (as in the case of one person who is bitching) you have a bulk license request, you really just need to buck up and pay these guys what they are worth or wait till they are ready. For bulk licensing, you shouldn't be purchasing through standard channels anyway, bulk pricing should be separate from education pricing. I'd like to say that despite finding the CLI easier the majority of the time (I'm a keyboard junkie), Versions is obviously the result of a lot of hard, meticulous, well thought out work, and is a stellar application for what it is — A GUI for SVN. Well done guys! (And thanks for taking a stance against git integration! :) - Davey --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
