Excellent and very valid points..I will just put in 2c more. If I were 
replacing a fly rod or rods, with the way things are today, I expect to pay $ 
250-300 for a rod. However we have rods now that  go $ 750-800 each..And this 
is another story...But it is an individual, personal decision, and if you 
really like the rod and you can afford it, then.....

Ron Boutin
---- Tom Davenport <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Hi, Chuck.  I thought I would chime in on this one.  In my years of fly 
> fishing and rod building, I have had three favorite rods: A Powell 6-7 
> weight, A Sage XP and a Scott SAS (both 5 wt).The Powell was a factory rod, 
> used when fishing in lakes where an 18 inch fish is average, the five weights 
> I built myself, and  used for everyday fishing. All three  of them have been 
> lost.  The Powell fell out of the back of my truck between a rest stop in 
> Pocatello Idaho, and Idaho falls, on the road to Yellowstone Lake. I had 
> opened the tailgate to get a drink out of the cooler, was distracted by a 
> question my wife asked me, and forgot to put the tailgate back up.  The Scott 
> ended up in the bottom of Strawberry Reservoir, in Utah, after falling out of 
> a cheap rod holder attached to my kick boat.  I lost the Sage last year after 
> fishing at a local community pond.  I laid it across the bed of my truck, got 
> distracted (can't blame this one on my wife), and drove away. It rolled off, 
> I assume, and was picked up by the jerk behind me who decided "finders 
> keepers" . I realized my mistake and went back 10 minutes later and there was 
> no sign of the rod or any piece of it.  I posted flyers around the pond, 
> notified the local police, put ads in newspaper, all to no avail.  The rod 
> has my name on it, so it wouldn't be hard for an honest person to track me 
> down.  Maybe someday I will come across somebody fishing with it!
> 
> These were all expensive rods, costing over $300.  And they were the ones I 
> fished with the most.
> 
> Anyway, were they worth the cost?  For me, yes, but I have to admit that a 
> large part of the "value" was pride of ownership, which is the intangible 
> that often drives people to purchase luxury items.  Also a desire to have the 
> VERY best, even though the differences between it and something cheaper  are 
> often negligible.  
> 
> But as far as performance goes, the Scott fit my casting style the best.  I 
> tend to have a punchy cast, and need a rod with a good solid butt section 
> that doesn't collapse when I power the rod.  Oh, I can slow down and cast 
> softer rods (like a bamboo rod, or a Winston) just fine, but I prefer a 
> punchy cast and faster rods. Also, I do a lot of high stick nymph fishing, 
> and a faster, stiffer rod seems to give me a better connection to what is 
> happening at the end of my line. 
> 
> I also own several rods I made from cheaper blanks, as well as a couple of 
> St. Croix Pro Graphites and a St. Croix Legend Ultra, which cast a lot like 
> the Sage XP.
> 
> So what ended up happening?  I replaced the Scott SAS with a factory Scott 
> rod, the successor to the SAS.  Different name, but casts about the same.  
> (Scott has quit selling blanks, so that was my only option).  A buddy of mine 
> found a factory Sage XP on ebay and bought it for me, but it is still sitting 
> in his garage waiting for me to drop by with the $280.00 he paid for it.  He 
> is a young entrepreneur who is running a multi-million dollar computer 
> business he started, so to him it was pocket change.  Not to me.  But 
> eventuality I will pick it up, in the meantime he fishes with it himself 
> occasionally. I replaced the Powell with a 6 wt Cabella's rod that was on 
> sale for half price.  It casts fine, and has the power to handle bigger fish, 
> but I can't say I love it like I did the Powell.  (The Powell rod can't be 
> replaced, that company has been bought and sold twice and the new  rods 
> aren't the same.  Mine was built by the original owners, and was a sweet rod).
> 
> So, "Were THEY REALLY THAT GOOD?"   From a purely practicable point of view, 
> probably not.  Your not going to catch six times as many fish because your 
> fishing with a rod six times more expensive than the guy next to you.  But if 
> you love the rod, if it performs exactly like you want it too, and you love 
> the way it looks and feels in your hand, then its worth every penny.  This is 
> a hobby, after all, and when did anyone worry about the cost of their hobby?  
> From a practical standpoint I would be WAY ahead if I had never started 
> building rods or tying flies.  Much cheaper in the long run to just go it and 
> buy what you need, when you need it.  No money wasted on flights to a fly 
> tying conclave.  No rod blanks, or rods that you built but really didn't need 
> cluttering up your life. But it also wouldn't be as much fun!
> 
> Tom Davenport
> 
> 
> On Feb 9, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Chuck Alexander <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> > Folks: I just downloaded and started watching a video called “Sage Fly 
> > Rods: Made in America” and it takes you on a tour of their factory, which 
> > is on an Island just off Seattle Washington, and tells about how great the 
> > fly rods are etc. Are their flyrods REALLY “THAT GOOD”?? Are they REALLY 
> > worth the prices they charge??  I have never casted one, but I have always 
> > told ppl that I think I’d put my $100 St Croix “Premier” against any rod on 
> > the market. And the Bamboo rod Tony built for me puts that St. Croix to 
> > shame. But that is sorta comparing apples to oranges to me, the bamboo vs. 
> > the Graphite rod, cause they are just totally different in their action 
> > etc. But anyway, the cheapest Sage I have seen, I believe is about  $300 
> > And that is for their “entry level” rods. Are they REALLY worth the money 
> > or is it like a lot of things and you are paying for that “name brand”?? 
> > Thanks, Chuck
> >  
> > 
> > -- 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VFB Mail" 
> > group.
> >  
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/vfb-mail?hl=en
> >  
> > VFB Mail is sponsored by Line's End Inc at http://www.linesend.com
> > --- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "VFB Mail" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to [email protected].
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >  
> >  
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VFB Mail" group.
> 
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/vfb-mail?hl=en
> 
> VFB Mail is sponsored by Line's End Inc at http://www.linesend.com
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "VFB Mail" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VFB Mail" group.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/vfb-mail?hl=en

VFB Mail is sponsored by Line's End Inc at http://www.linesend.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VFB 
Mail" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to