Hi Dick I had to give you a shot anyway. Dean --- Richard Brouillette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was being facetious and it did not come out right. > But it will add some distance to the average > persons cast if that is the objective. > > Dick > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/12/02 11:03AM >>> > HI Dick > I'd like to give you the benefit of doubt, but > 300 > ft. Are you a tournament caster. > Dean > --- Richard Brouillette > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree, I use a 9' 8 wt for steelhead. In the > > summer I use the same rod for > > walleye on a warm water lake and load it with a 9 > wt > > sinking line and I can "throw" it 100 yards, but I > > have tried it with a 6 wt and it is not very > > effective. > > > > Dick > > > > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/12/02 09:17AM >>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Say you have a rod designated as an 8 wt, what > would > > happen to > > performance if you used say a 7 Wt? Or possibly a > 6 > > Wt with the rod ? > > > > > > You can go up a weight on the line for most rods > but > > not down very well. A heavier line might be > called > > for on some rods but a lighter line becomes > > difficult to control. > > > > Murf > > Dave Murphy > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free > email! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ >
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/
