Stephen,
thank you for your  comments , i thouroughly enjoyed
the input  as well as the rhetoric, you have confirmed
whith what i have thought along  basicly common sense
angling and skill, and although i make every attempt
to return the fishies back to their evironment  i do
understand that glory has its price  also i dont
hesitate in eating the fishies when i want to.
Well done 
brad robinson 
 
--- Stephen DiCerbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:22 PM 4/9/02, you wrote:
> >Dear lister's,
> >In my progression of fishing, I am finding  myself
> >wanting  to catch bigger fish on lighter tackle.
> >my question is this, lighter tackle means longer
> >playing time. Thus the fish must get tired,and face
> a
> >chance of dying.is it more ethical to use heavier
> >tackle with fewer chances of harming the trophy or
> if
> >done properly can a concious angler use lighter
> >tackle.  Im looking for  more challenge in my
> angling
> >the landing isnt as important to me as the battle
> >itself but the most important thing to me is the
> >welfare of the fish
> 
> 
>       Ethics  are a system of personal beliefs..... 
>   if the most 
> important thing to you is the welfare of the fish,
> you have answered
> your own question......    you can take this to the
> extreme of not fishing 
> at all , or to some modification  of fishing that
> limits the sport and the 
> challenge, yet suits your  feelings about the sport
> and the 
> endgame  involved....
> 
>     Some folks think the sport and the challenge is
> all in the take of the 
> fly, the deception.....   they are able to fish with
> flies that have no 
> points, and forgo  the battle  of wits and the
> adrenaline of the fight, the 
> closure of "counting coup" received by landing the
> fish (in whatever manner)
> 
>      For me, this is simply not  possible........  
> the fight and the 
> conclusion of that fight are the biggest part of the
> sport.....   hell, the 
> fish can manage to hook himself through no skill of
> mine, half the time.....
> 
>      I find, however,  that there is a balance in
> the progression  of 
> improved skill  with lighter tackle....    you
> should reduce the "weight" 
> of your tackle only  as you become skilled enough to
> land your fish without 
> overstressing him.......    how you fight him is how
> you fight 
> him.....  If, during the fight you decide you wish
> to land the prize at ANY 
> cost, and you mickey mouse around with a fish on
> light tackle ,  you stand 
> the chance of overplaying him......
> 
>      If, however, you decide while fighting him that
> you will do every 
> thing in your power to bring him in under the least
> stressful  conditions, 
> then   you have made the choice between overplay or
> not to over 
> play....  the tackle doesn't do this.....    you are
> either skilled enough 
> to bring him in efficiently with the light tackle,
> or you are not skilled 
> enough to do so, and he breaks away, and is free.
> 
>     Understand that even heavy heavy tackle doesn't
> insure a quick and 
> effortless finish to the game....   little Tunny  
> will tear off so fast 
> and so far as to be a serious threat to slicing your
> hand with the 
> flyline.   Yet their excellent fighting instincts is
> often their downfall, 
> as the intense effort changes their blood chemistry,
> and they can be a 
> challenge to revive after the fight.
> 
> 
>      One thing you do need to accept is that from
> point zero, from impaling 
> the fish, you are stressing him,  and putting him at
> risk.....  releasing a 
> fish upright and breathing doesn't insure his
> survival....    C&R  is 
> less  successful than most zealots think, and it is
> often times something 
> that they use to assuage their wounded ethics.  It
> is a blood sport you 
> participate in, my friend....   at some level we all
> need to accept that.
> 
>        you might consider changing the structure of
> your ethics.....      I 
> come from a management background, and although fish
> are revered and 
> honored creatures to me, deserving of my
> respect.....    I do not lose 
> sight of the fact that they are animals,  a 
> resource to be treasure and 
> maintained,  but a dead fish  is often part of the
> game.
> 
> 
>     Perhaps  you got more rhetoric here than you
> wished, but I believe your 
> answer can be found here, and is a matter of
> degrees....
> 
> 
> Splinta
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to