An Ugly Stick marketed as an ultralight model could be correctly identified as "ultralight", yes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/21/2002 09:43:04 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: John Roth-CPD/USA/MCCRK) Subject: Re: [VFB] Trout Fishing do you consider an ugly stick as "ultralight" ? Thomas >-- Original-Nachricht -- >Subject: Re: [VFB] Trout Fishing >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:57:09 -0400 >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >I do a fair bit of striper fishing in the Chesapeake Bay each season and >I've got a buddy who ABSOLUTELY insists on catching a trophy rock on >ultralight spinning gear. He always uses an Ugly Stick rod with a Penn >ultralight spinning reel spooled with something ridiculous like 4 pound >test. To the best of my knowledge, he's never hooked into any saltwater >fish of any real substance before, and he's definitely never done it with >ultralight gear. If he pulls this off, I'll recognize him as the almighty >king of ultralight fishing. > > > > > > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/21/2002 03:45:35 AM > >Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >cc: (bcc: John Roth-CPD/USA/MCCRK) > >Subject: Re: [VFB] Trout Fishing > > >In a message dated 10/20/2002 5:51:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >������ Mine is an ultra-light spin rod, spooled with 6# mono, > >6 lb test mono?� That can hardly be considered ultra-light! > >Tom Tully, PA-C >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Idaho Falls, Idaho > > > > > >
