Wes, to properly answer your question (suggestion) one must consider the
entire history of fly-fishing, a period exceeding 500 years at least as
far as the English language is concerned. With some exceptions (Atlantic
salmon & bass flies primarily but not exclusively), the focus for about
450 of those years was the imitation or representation of natural
insects to catch trout. About 150 - 200 years ago, the basic
confirmation of the dry fly was "set." That is, tail, body, wings, &
ruff hackle. Anything afterwards, that followed that conformation (i.e.
a Wulff), was merely a material substitution. Downwing flies extend
backwards 500 years, so Trudes and EHC styles are material
substitutions. Comparadun forms aren't new either, at least one
progenitor, the Haystack, is over 70 years old. Parachutes are a
"modern" invention, being only 70 or so years old.

At least as far as I can tell, the modern form of the nymph (tail,
abdomen, thorax, wingcase, "legs") was created by Skues more than 100
years ago; anything later is a material substitution. One might consider
beadheads a modern invention but they are, if all claims are correct, a
century old as well.

Streamers are often considered an American invention, but they aren't.
300 years ago European anglers were fishing with flies made with whole
hackle feather wings. Even the word streamer is questionable, I have a
book dated in the mid-1800s from Canada that refers to an "Indian
Streamer" pattern that would work quite well today. Bucktails are merely
a material substitution.

It was in around the mid-20th century that things changed. With the
advent of hundreds of synthetic materials, new lines, and the expansion
of fly-fishing as a method to include almost anything that swims; new
patterns exploded. I wouldn't try and say who was first with what, but
the imitations of saltwater baitfish, crabs, shrimp, etc., did take new
directions, very diffenent in concept from the trout, salmon, bass
heritage.

Other historic tidbits: early use of wound marabou (170 years ago),
early use of metal propellor on flies (120 years ago), early use of
flash material in wings (100 years ago), etc. As an aside, imitations of
terrestrials are more than 500 years old.

However, when it comes to trout flies, if it walks like a duck, and
quacks like a duck, it's likely a duck. At least 80% of the designs you
mentioned essentially involve variations on well established forms.

So, having rambled on for some time, off the top of my head what do I
consider to be ten true innovations in fly-tying methods? They are
listed below in no particular order, and to my knowledge few if any can
be attributed 100% to an individual.

1. spinning deer hair on the hook so that one can shape a body.
2. the use of a tube, rather than a hook, on which to mount materials.
3. parachute hackle
4. winding of a hackle (likely predated first English-language writing,
likely 600 years or more).
5. woven hair hackles - never really caught on but was certainly unique.
6. crocheted or woven bodies
7. combination of plastic (resins) and natural materials; Wulff's
Surface Stonefly is an example (not the first) - this led into the epoxy
revolution.
8. extended bodies
9. fur strip wings (150 years old) - this is a close call
10. altering the shape of the hook to achieve certain affects, e.g., the
keel hook

Have a go with this list to see what you might add.
 

Cheers,
Paul 
-- 
Paul Marriner
Outdoor Writing & Photography. Member OWAA & OWC. Author of Stillwater
Fly Fishing - Tools & Tactics (CD), Modern Atlantic Salmon Flies,
Miramichi River Journal, Ausable River Journal, and Atlantic Salmon.

Reply via email to