-----Original Message-----
From: video-codec on behalf of "Timothy B. Terriberry"
Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 4:28 PM
To: "[email protected]"
Subject: Re: [video-codec] draft-filippov-netvc-requirements-01
>Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
>> I read this draft after seeing the presentation yesterday. Overall, I dont
>> like the fact that this draft tries to cover a lot of use cases quite
>> narrowly. There are so many omissions here and there.
>>
>> The charter for this WG is to provide a good codec for interactive video
>> applications. So all the rest of the use cases should be dropped and not
>> discussed at all.
>
>I think at the very least on-demand Netflix/Youtube/etc. streaming is a
>very important internet use case that we want to satisfy. Interactive is
>called out explicitly by the charter because it imposes a set of severe
>technical constraints on what the codec can do, but I don't think the
>intent was to limit us to that use case (as indicated by the words "but
>not necessarily limited to" in the charter).
I understand that part but what I am saying is that developing a codec that
will both perform enough well for interactive video and streaming video is a
tedious task. Focusing on two different things will increase the risk of
failure for this wg. Maybe the wg should consider solving the first (and the
more important) problem first and then see whether it can tackle the second
problem.
>
>_______________________________________________
>video-codec mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
_______________________________________________
video-codec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
