Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
I read this draft after seeing the presentation yesterday. Overall, I dont like
the fact that this draft tries to cover a lot of use cases quite narrowly.
There are so many omissions here and there.
The charter for this WG is to provide a good codec for interactive video
applications. So all the rest of the use cases should be dropped and not
discussed at all.
I think at the very least on-demand Netflix/Youtube/etc. streaming is a
very important internet use case that we want to satisfy. Interactive is
called out explicitly by the charter because it imposes a set of severe
technical constraints on what the codec can do, but I don't think the
intent was to limit us to that use case (as indicated by the words "but
not necessarily limited to" in the charter).
_______________________________________________
video-codec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
