Re: [video-codec] draft-filippov-netvc-requirements-01

Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:29:53 -0700 




-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Daede
Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM
To: "Ali C. Begen", "[email protected]"
Subject: Re: [video-codec] draft-filippov-netvc-requirements-01

>On 07/21/2015 06:14 PM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
>
>>>>> - All of the use cases should specify either a high latency or low
>>>>> latency requirement.
>>>> And where is the borderline?
>>>
>>> What is a borderline use case? I would much rather keep the number of
>>> configurations as low as possible.
>> 
>> I mean what is low latency vs high latency. And who decides that?
>> 
>
>It is defined in draft-daede-netvc-testing-01 [1]. And some of the
>definition should probably be moved into the requirements draft, though
>individual codec parameters still belong in the testing draft.
>
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-daede-netvc-testing/

I searched for latency and delay, nothing showed up. The only time related 
number seems to be 300ms in section 5.3.
_______________________________________________
video-codec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec






















					Reply via email to