On 10/29/2015 12:41 PM, Mohammad AlSaleh wrote:
> Looking at chapel subjectively, I think an option to use a weaker
> filter would be helpful.
>
> Generally, the filter gives good subjective results. But some of
> the details might get lost (e.g. the last steps leading to the chapel).
It isn't really a matter of stronger vs weaker filter. The encoder can
turn the deringing filter on/off for every superblock, so any issue
would come down to how the encoder made the decision to keep the
filtered superblock. For example, the distortion function could be
missing something, or the encoder could be deciding to "sacrifice" some
region of the superblock to make another region better.
Cheers,
Jean-Marc
_______________________________________________
video-codec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
