Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 1:48:17 PM, Verdi wrote: > <URL: http://michaelverdi.com/codec/256_H264.mov > (481KB) > <URL: http://michaelverdi.com/codec/256_3ivx.mov > (561KB)
> <URL: http://michaelverdi.com/codec/384_H264.mov > (725KB) > <URL: http://michaelverdi.com/codec/384_3ivx.mov > (729KB) > The point of this discussion, for me, was to point out what I feel > is an often repeated and unfair criticism of QuickTime, by Windows > users. Namely, "you can't make QuickTime clips as small as Windows > Media." As you can see from these comparison clips, you certainly > can. Thanks. That's excellent news. I've tried many times with what I have, but never been able to get anything approaching the size and quality of these using Quicktime. I've wanted for a while to put up a feed of QT versions of my files, but at typically 2-3 times the file size it simply didn't seem feasible. I'd certainly use these if I could, though. Can you post more details of the tools/settings that you used to make them? And for a bonus question, are they likely to be iPod compliant? -- Frank Carver http://www.makevideo.org.uk ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
