On 10/26/05, andrew michael baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I standby my claim: you have a lot to learn about new media.

as i mentioned before. there is no need to be patronising.. it's too much of let down to have to send you my CV andrew, so please trust me.. i know a fair amount about new media.
 
I would start by having a look at the blog format and asking yourself how blogging is different from writing for a newspaper.  Would you say the Boing Boing is just doing the same thing as the New York Times?

diid you actually read my previous post? i said (and now say for the final time) i was referring to VISUAL STYLE AND CONTENT ONLY, not delivery medium, not external context, not distribution..etc etc etc, 
Referencing BoingBoing is a poorly thought example when we're talking about visual style and content. BB has text and image on its page, but that text contains (visible) hypertext links, there are images in full colour and some animated adverts, none of which is seen in the New York Times, what is in the visual content of Rocketboom videos that isn't on television?
 
Or, if you are like most personal videobloggers, ask yourself 'how is a blogging different than a writing a personal diary?"

Once you mull that over for awhile, you may be more prepared to start considering how video on a blog is different than video on a TV. That's just one angle, but it may be a good starting point.

leave it out andrew, if you want a sensible and educated debate i'm all up for it, but please make sure you actually read and understand the points i made before coming back with the usual 'how video on a blog is different', that hasn't ever been my point.
 

It may be important to take into consideration not only how they are different, but how each platform informs the content as well.

yes.. i've read McLuhan too


be well


d


 



SPONSORED LINKS
Individual Fireant Use


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to