Why do you say granularity for the sake of granularity? That's not a goal. Granularity for the sake of creating works that embrace the workings of the web could be one. I don't know what to make of your comment about it being academic - the word is ambiguous.
- Andreas On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:46:53 +0200, Mat Wall-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not yet its not Andreas...in fact granularity for granularity's sake is > particularly tedious......at the moment then the 'interest' is purely > academic > > > On 27/10/05 3:39 PM, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:08:21 +0200, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> As we've been collectively defining >>> videoblogging by practicing it for a while now it seems to me that >>> the highly granular, hyper-texty video that Andreas holds in high >>> regard is only a small part of videoblogging - and it's not the main >>> part. >> >> But it's the most interesting part. :o) >> >> - Andreas > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > -- <URL:http://www.solitude.dk/> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
