Why don't you give us some of the special links you have found.  I think posters here should start doing that.  People can then make up their own mind as to how reliable certain names on vlogging are.
 
Randolfe (Randy) Wicker
 
Videographer, Writer, Activist
Advisor: The Immortality Institute
Hoboken, NJ
http://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/
201-656-3280
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Spirit can not be spoken for

Michael Sullivan wrote:

>
> I believe in random listing of vlogs more so than any other algorithm,
> and I am aware that even randoms are imperfect.
> So, i disagree that you *have* to sort by something.


good point!

I have found more fun new vlogs randomly through Ro's (aka firehttp)
videoblogging-universe ring video thumb clips than from any directory search

of course, his ring is based on a directory - but the way they are
presented to me is in fact randomly


Interesting aside: you can mathematically justify that the best way to
optimize many sorting operations is to *first* randomly shuffle the
data.  This is because "real world" data is often "skewed" or "clumped"
in ways that increase the need for comparisons.   Maybe this applies to
wetware too.

markus

--

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to