On 12/2/05, Frank Carver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, of course, but... I don't think that any of the sites which purport to review everything before allowing it to be posted have set themselves a reasonable task. As video on the Internet explodes exponentially, no single group or company (except maybe Google) can afford the human resources to review that much footage.
I'm assuming that the rest of your post advocates "reactive" tagging, where something would be reviewed only if flagged as nasty by someone. Which does seem the only sensible approach, as long as you don't get mischief-makers randomly tagging everything as rotten just to keep you busy.
I don't think it would work leaving the categorizing to the submitter.
I can imagine plenty of reasons why someone might (deliberately or
accidentally) mis-categorize something.
Yes, of course, but... I don't think that any of the sites which purport to review everything before allowing it to be posted have set themselves a reasonable task. As video on the Internet explodes exponentially, no single group or company (except maybe Google) can afford the human resources to review that much footage.
I'm assuming that the rest of your post advocates "reactive" tagging, where something would be reviewed only if flagged as nasty by someone. Which does seem the only sensible approach, as long as you don't get mischief-makers randomly tagging everything as rotten just to keep you busy.
best regards,
Deirdré Straughan
www.beginningwithi.com (personal)
www.tvblob.com (work)
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
