Yeah, it's undisputed here, Fireant's the dog's bollocks of aggregators.
I'm suggesting we invite the innovators into the conversation, from the
outside it looks like the Stickam peeps are on the ball and have ideas
and tech know how.
Let's get them in here and talk. Just because NIH it'ss no reason to
not think they can help help expand the vlogging universe. It's not
about business competition, is it?
The point is they are hosting video and have have a nice interface.
Dierdre (hi Dierdre) pointed out in another mail she was having
trouble uploading to them but thought well of their interface, let's
give them feedback. I really like youtube, vsocial, audioblog, vpod.tv,
blip.tv, vimeo, youare.tv (an others I'm forgetting to mention here)
and the Archive, but why not have more choices?
Stickam is just launching yesterday (or today?) and probably working
out their strategy as are probably some of the others. Nothing is
perfect yet. Can't we be constructive instead of dismissive?
Let's give them a chance too. Do Stickcam even know about this group?
Let's invite them and see if they can help progress the videoblogging
effort.
What do you say? (and again, I wasn't dissing Fireant in the previous
email, it's only that I'm newly finding I like to visit the blogs of
the peeps posting and see their work in context).
On Feb 14, 2006, at 9:59 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
> ... FireAnt
> is a great tool for consuming lots of video from distributed sources.
> I'm not just saying that because I'm one of the creators.
> ... your question had to do
> with whether Stickam had value to videoblogging, i still don't believe
> it does. For other applications, maybe so.
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
