i understand and agree, i was mainly just diving deeper into how the bandwidth was consumed vs cached.

the main point is that they are different for these apps; but then so are their purposes and hence the difficulty in comparison as you say


Joshua Kinberg wrote:
I'm sorry... I meant to say, you were comparing a media aggregator
like FireAnt to a standard web browser in terms of bandwidth usage,
whereas the article pointed out was describing a regular text based
News Aggregator to a web browser in terms of bandwidth usage.

I think its silly to compare a New Aggregator to a browser and claim
the aggregator is the greater bandwidth hog... however a media
aggregator will certainly consume bandiwdth as its primary purpose is
to download large media objects.

-Josh


On 2/16/06, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
no, actually, i was comparing the two equally

Joshua Kinberg wrote:

    
You're talking more about a media aggregator like FireAnt as opposed
to a browser.


      
--

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Yahoo! Groups Links








    


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





  


-- 

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


SPONSORED LINKS
Individual Fireant Use


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to