i don't recall if anyone has already mentioned the great work on V L O G ~ F L U X
these are "long" by many people's standards (recently they have been running 6 to 20 minutes) fantastic reporting from new orleans i feel that each post has been well worth watching and i have shown them to others too (and I enjoyed them again) http://fluxrostrum.blogspot.com/ missbhavens1969 wrote: >To me, short means less than 1.5 minutes. "Standard" means up to 3.5 minutes >(that >sounds more exact than I mean for it to be. It's not like I sit at my desk >with an egg >timer). Past 3.5" and I start wondering...but sometimes I'm so captivated that >I don't notice >the time flying by. Luckily my schedule allows for rambling daily >vlog-watching. There are >a couple of videoblogs things that tie me to my computer for way longer than >3.5". > >I like shorter posts because it means I can pack more >real-life-artsy-whacko-short-film- >concert goodness into my day all at once. That's pretty much the only reason. > >Short and sweet. > >Sweet. > >--Bekah >htttp://www/missbhavens/com > > -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://node101.org http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
